Full match — all four players live
Ground circles · live speed HUD · JAGDISH / SHIVA / BHASKAR / HARI labels · distinct colours per player.
Team A vs Team B
Near court (Team A) covered 53m more as a pair — Hari+Bhaskar did more chasing from the near side.
| Metric | Team A — Near court (Hari + Bhaskar) | Team B — Far court (Jagdish + Shiva) |
|---|---|---|
| Total distance | 840.3 m | 787.7 m |
| Peak speed | 35.9 km/h | 35.1 km/h |
| Avg moving speed | 6.3 km/h | 5.9 km/h |
| Lunge tags | 113 | 13 |
| Track lock | 62% | 60% |
Individual breakdown
| Player | Distance | Peak | Avg speed | Lock | Lunges | Dist 1st/2nd/3rd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARI | 424.3 m | 35.1 | 6.8 | 51% | 61 | 166.5 / 120.7 / 137.1 |
| BHASKAR | 416.0 m | 35.9 | 5.9 | 73% | 52 | 165.6 / 117.4 / 133.0 |
| JAGDISH | 458.5 m | 34.9 | 5.9 | 81% | 4 | 206.2 / 130.8 / 121.5 |
| SHIVA | 329.2 m | 35.1 | 5.9 | 40% | 9 | 108.9 / 96.9 / 123.4 |
Partner sync & work share
Near court pair
HARI and BHASKAR share court coverage fairly evenly (424m vs 416m) — good partner balance.
Hari covers 50.5% of near-court distance, Bhaskar 49.5%.
Far court pair
When rallies get long, JAGDISH covers 139% more ground than SHIVA — he tend to chase while SHIVA holds base more often.
Jagdish covers 58.2% of far-court distance, Shiva 41.8%.
Pace by match third
HARI slows 24% from opening to closing third (7.5→5.7 km/h avg) — fatigue or tactical pacing.
BHASKAR slows 18% from opening to closing third (6.5→5.3 km/h avg) — fatigue or tactical pacing.
JAGDISH slows 40% from opening to closing third (6.5→3.9 km/h avg) — fatigue or tactical pacing.
SHIVA slows 13% from opening to closing third (5.5→4.8 km/h avg) — fatigue or tactical pacing.
Highlight window
Busiest 2-minute segment from motion scan.
What each player can work on
HARI: tracking was patchy — stay in frame centre more during resets; high lunge count — work on quicker recovery steps back to base.
BHASKAR: high lunge count — work on quicker recovery steps back to base.
JAGDISH: few lunge tags detected — get lower on net kills and defensive retrieves.
SHIVA: tracking was patchy — stay in frame centre more during resets.
How to read this: Distance and speed from foot tracking via court homography — no wearables. Team framing is positional (near vs far court), not official match scoring. Cross-correlations derived from movement timing only.